- 34+ Verified Top Prop Firms
- 14+ Active Offers
- 600+ Challenges
- 3M+ Monthly Website Views
Pick two or three prop firms and compare them side by side on cost, rules, payouts, and availability. Every populated cell links to the official source it came from and shows when it was last checked. No scores, no winner — the numbers are yours to weigh.
- high value taken straight from the firm’s official page. medium official but stage/size-dependent or partially stated. low weak or indirect source — verify.
- unknown / source needed means we have not captured an official value for that cell yet, so we show nothing rather than guess. An empty cell is not a negative mark against a firm.
- Where two official sources describe the same rule differently — or a firm runs several account families with different rules — the cell explains the difference and cites each source, instead of picking a side or labelling the firm inconsistent.
- Asset-class support (futures, forex/CFD) is not the same as account eligibility in your country; use the linked availability boards for that.
- There is deliberately no “best firm” output. Comparison is a fact grid, not advice.
How we check rows, sources & commercial separation
Row fields. Every firm row is assembled from the same official fact sets that power the per-topic BestProps boards (cost, daily-loss-limit, drawdown, news, payout). Each populated cell carries an official source URL, a last-checked date, and a confidence label. Fields with no captured official value are shown as “unknown / source needed” rather than filled with estimates.
Single fact set. A firm’s value here is the same value used on its per-topic board — no second copy. Where captured official sources describe the same rule differently, or a firm runs multiple account families (for example an evaluation account with a daily-loss rule alongside a trailing account without one), the cell explains the difference and cites each source. It does not label a firm inconsistent or resolve the difference silently.
Affiliate firewall. This tool never ranks, scores, badges, or names a “winner,” and affiliate relationships never affect inclusion, order, or any cell value. Sort and firm selection are entirely user-driven. Any future scored or “best-fit” view would require a separate, published scoring method.
Reference sizes. Costs and rule figures use a common reference account (typically the 50K program) where captured; the reference program and size are shown in each Cost cell. Some firms were captured at a different size and are labelled accordingly.
Why do some cells say “unknown”?
We only print a value when we have an official source for it. If a firm’s payout minimum or drawdown model has not been captured from its own pages yet, the cell stays empty on purpose. The per-topic boards linked above are where those gaps get filled first.
Why is there no “best firm” result?
Firms suit different traders. A tighter daily loss limit is safer for some and limiting for others; a faster payout cadence may come with a higher minimum. The grid lays the facts side by side so you can decide against your own plan.
How do corrections work?
If a firm believes a cell is wrong or stale, the source and checked date are shown so it can be re-verified against the official page. Firms can request a correction through the BestProps contact channels.
Source and page notes. Data as of July 3, 2026. BestProps is independent and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by any firm listed here. This page currently has no signup links, paid placements, sponsored rows, or monetized routing. Futures and forex/CFD programs use different rule structures and are not always directly comparable; each firm’s asset class is shown in its column. Comparison is informational, not financial, trading, tax, or legal advice. Figures are last-checked snapshots of official sources and can change without notice.
