ICT Obsidian Teaching: Opposing Wicks and Higher-Timeframe Narrative
ICT defines Obsidian as two opposing wicks interpreted within a higher-timeframe narrative, with price assessed between the midpoint of each wick.
Read the researchEditorial research
Browse evidence-aware guides, updates, and practical explanations from the BestProps Research Team.
0 visible
ICT defines Obsidian as two opposing wicks interpreted within a higher-timeframe narrative, with price assessed between the midpoint of each wick.
Read the researchICT’s Part 3 lesson asks new students to replace cluttered charts with separate, repeatable layouts for macro levels, prior-week ranges, opening gaps, and selected inefficiencies.
Read the researchA source-conscious study guide to the ICT New York NWOG forex topic associated with January 27, 2025, including plotting steps, session context, hypothetical scenarios, and risk…
Read the researchICT reviews NQ through a daily imbalance and the 7:00–9:00 premarket range, then explains why the fast opening decline did not provide his planned entry.
Read the researchICT reviews a volatile NQ session during Jackson Hole week, explaining his inversion fair value gap interpretation, event-risk management and process-first study routine.
Read the researchAn independent guide to ICT 2025 opening range gaps, including terminology, chart-marking steps, SMC confluence, common mistakes, and validation risks.
Read the researchICT uses a post-holiday session to illustrate why he starts with reduced exposure or paper trading, then evaluates opening gaps, liquidity, imbalances, and candle-body behavior before…
Read the researchICT reviews a Nasdaq NFP session through his TGIF retracement, opening-gap, fair-value-gap, and lunch-macro concepts before encouraging new students to study patiently and become independent.
Read the researchSeveral prop firms have been associated with RiseWorks payouts, but current availability requires first-party confirmation. Here is what funded traders should verify before choosing a firm.
Read the researchCompare prop firms using a repeatable framework covering true cost, drawdown mechanics, funded-stage restrictions, payout policies, platform fit, and operational transparency.
Read the research