Which Prop Firms Allow Martingale and Grid Trading? Rule by Rule

Key takeaways

We checked 15 prop firms against their own current rules pages for martingale and grid trading, tested separately, because several firms allow one and ban the other.

Read the full summary

We checked 15 prop firms against their own current rules pages for martingale and grid trading, tested separately, because several firms allow one and ban the other. Four firms do not ban either style outright: E8 Markets (E8 Pro 8% preset, a dedicated FAQ says martingale is allowed, grid never named, cheapest at $57.00 per $1,000 of loss room), FundedNext (CFD arm, Stellar Lite, martingale allowed, grid banned, $57.50), Tradeify (martingale allowed if not hedging, grid never named, $72.50), and City Traders Imperium (martingale capped at 2% risk on its 1-Step Challenge only, grid banned everywhere, $119.60). Seven firms never name either style on any current page, which we mark as not published, never as permission: Alpha Capital Group, Apex Trader Funding, Bulenox, FTMO, FXIFY, MyFundedFutures and Topstep. Four firms ban at least one style by name: Audacity and Funding Traders ban both; Blue Guardian Futures bans martingale and is silent on grid; FundedNext Futures bans grid and is silent on martingale.

Freshness: checked October 3, 2026. Firms change terms without notice; re-check before you trade. Each firm’s Trustpilot figure carries the date we read it.

Quick answer on prop firms that allow martingale and grid

• Cheapest clean allowance: E8 Markets (E8 Pro 8% preset), martingale allowed, grid never named, $57.00 per $1,000 of loss room.
• Second cheapest: FundedNext (CFD, Stellar Lite), martingale allowed, grid banned outright, $57.50.
• Named “yes” with one condition: Tradeify, martingale allowed if you are not hedging, $72.50.
• Capped, product-specific allowance: City Traders Imperium, martingale at 2% risk on the 1-Step Challenge only, $119.60.
• Dedicated martingale FAQ: E8 Markets answers the exact question by name, $57.00.

Silence is never permission in this guide. A firm that has never named martingale or grid on any current page goes in the not-published group below, with the advice to get written confirmation from support before you trade it, not a quiet assumption that it is allowed.

What martingale and grid trading are, and why prop firms police them

Martingale means increasing your position size after a loss, usually by doubling, to try to recover the loss on the next trade. Grid trading means placing a fixed ladder of buy and sell orders at set price intervals above and below the current price, so the position averages in as price moves, regardless of direction. They are different styles and firms test them separately: City Traders Imperium allows martingale with a cap on one plan and bans grid on every plan, proof that a single brand-level yes or no would be wrong for one of the two styles no matter which way you answered.

Risk teams single out both styles for the same underlying reason: each can produce a smooth, flattering equity curve over a short sample while carrying a loss on the tail end of a losing streak that no fixed account size can absorb. City Traders Imperium states this plainly in its own rules: these strategies “Can generate unrealistic profit curves. Cannot be monetised in real markets. Do not reflect the trader’s actual skill. Carry a very high probability of blowing the account. Make risk impossible to model or replicate reliably.”

Is there a 100% profitable martingale strategy? No. Doubling your size after a loss recovers that loss on the next win, but a long enough losing streak produces a bet size and a loss that no account survives; the risk is mathematically unbounded even though most short samples look clean. That unbounded tail is exactly why several firms cap or ban it rather than leave it unaddressed.

How we checked which prop firms allow martingale and grid

1. Sources: each firm’s rules page, FAQ or help center, and Terms of Service or prohibited-trading-strategies document, read October 3, 2026; never a forum thread or a competing roundup.
2. Separate tests: martingale and grid trading are two independent checks per firm; a result on one style is never assumed to apply to the other.
3. Classification: each style is marked Allowed, Allowed with a cap, Banned, or Not published, from the firm’s own current wording, never inferred from silence.
4. Rank test: a product ranks only when at least one style is Allowed or Allowed with a cap, with neither style conflicting; sorted by both-vs-one, clean-vs-capped, then cost per $1,000 of loss room.
5. Arms: a forex/CFD arm and a futures arm of the same brand are separate listings; a finding on one is never carried onto the other.

A discretionary live call-up is a fact to weigh, not a ranking reason (none of the four ranked products here are disqualified by one). Automation permission generally, separate from this post’s position-sizing test, is covered in our prop firms that allow automated trading guide, and trade-speed rules are covered in our prop firms that allow HFT guide.

Prop firms that allow martingale or grid trading, ranked, checked October 3, 2026

Firms here allow at least one style on their own current pages. Sorted by how many styles are allowed, clean permissions before capped ones, then cost per $1,000 of loss room at $50K (list price).

Notes on this ranking: cost per $1,000 of loss room = (list price + activation fee) ÷ overall max-loss floor at $50K × 1,000, never a daily loss limit or minimum balance. City Traders Imperium’s cap applies only to its 1-Step Challenge; its 2-Step and Instant Funding products ban martingale outright and are not the product priced here. E8 Markets’ E8 One lists at $288 ($260 with code E8, no stated end date) on a $6,000 EOD-trailing floor with a 40% Best Day consistency rule, so the $228 E8 Pro 8% static preset is the product ranked here.

Martingale and grid rules by firm

E8 Markets runs a dedicated FAQ titled exactly ‘Is the martingale strategy allowed?’

E8 Markets is the only firm in this research with a help-center article titled for this exact question.

Video: “E8 One Explained: The Fastest Path to E8 Performance,” E8 Markets official YouTube channel, June 12, 2026. No official E8 video is specifically about martingale or grid; this official E8 One explainer is the closest available on the firm’s own channel.

• Martingale: Allowed, No numeric cap stated; general platform caps (one strategy per user, 100 open orders, 2,000 positions a day) still apply. “”Yes, we allow our traders to utilize the martingale strategy. You can use whatever strategy you want… We do not prohibit specific strategy types like martingale, and we allow traders to operate their edge as long as it can be executed under real market conditions.”” (source)
• Grid trading: Not published, Checked across the martingale FAQ, the Trading Policies article and both help-center search boxes; genuinely absent. “A help-center search for the exact word “grid” on both of E8’s help centers returns “We couldn’t find any articles for: grid.”” (source)
• Stage it applies to: E8 One, E8 Pro and E8 Signature (Classic Markets), all stages
• Consequence if breached: Not stated for martingale itself; a shared or commercial EA that matches another user’s trades can still trigger termination under a separate one-strategy-per-user rule.
• Cost at $50K: $228 list, $0 activation, on a $4,000 max-loss floor at $50K = $57.00 per $1,000 of loss room (E8 Pro 8% static preset).
• Payouts: Payout rules were not part of this check; see the firm’s rules page linked below.
• Watch out for: Third-party trackers claim E8 allows both martingale and grid, but only the martingale half is firm-confirmed; grid trading is simply never named on either of E8’s two help centers.
• Trustpilot: rating hidden (“breach of our guidelines” banner), 3,298 reviews (read September 30, 2026). rules.

FundedNext names martingale EAs as allowed, then bans grid trading outright

FundedNext’s own help center draws a sharp line between the two styles it is asked about most.

Video: “Resetting Your FundedNext Account,” FundedNext official YouTube channel, January 9, 2024. No FundedNext video names martingale or grid specifically; this official account-reset explainer is the closest available on the ranked product.

• Martingale: Allowed, No numeric cap stated; the only condition is keeping the same overall strategy between the Challenge and the funded account. “”FundedNext does not impose any limitations or restrictions on trader’s strategy, whether it involves discretionary trading or EAs that employ martingale strategies to generate profits.”” (source)
• Grid trading: Banned, Named and banned outright, no product exception found. “”Grid trading is prohibited because it can lead to market manipulation and create artificial activity. It also increases risk, as a large market movement in one direction can trigger many losses simultaneously.”” (source)
• Stage it applies to: Challenge and FundedNext Account (Stellar), all programs
• Consequence if breached: “Immediate Account Termination or Permanent Termination from the Platform, with the Performance Reward or Refund denied or adjusted accordingly” for a grid breach.
• Cost at $50K: $229.99 list, $0 activation, on a $4,000 max-loss floor at $50K = $57.50 per $1,000 of loss room (Stellar Lite).
• Payouts: Payout rules were not part of this check; see the firm’s payouts page linked below.
• Watch out for: Martingale is clean on this product, but grid trading ends the account immediately; switching your overall strategy between the Challenge and funded stage is a separate rule that can also flag your account.
• Trustpilot: 4.5/5 on 80,485 reviews (read September 30, 2026). rules, payouts.

Tradeify answers martingale with a flat yes, tied to one condition about hedging

Tradeify puts the martingale question in its Common FAQs and answers it in one sentence.

Video: “Ep. 8 | Get Funded in 24 Hours (Tradeify Growth Plan Explained),” Tradeify official YouTube channel, January 12, 2026. No Tradeify video addresses martingale or grid specifically; this official Growth plan explainer is the closest available on the ranked product.

• Martingale: Allowed, No numeric risk cap; the only condition is that the sizing never creates a hedged position. “”Is martingale strategy allowed? Yes, as long as you’re not hedging. Be aware that martingale is high-risk – stay within your drawdown and daily loss limits.”” (source)
• Grid trading: Not published, Checked and not found; marked honestly as not published, never assumed allowed. “No mention of grid trading anywhere in the Funded Trader Agreement or the help center; a search for “grid” returns only charting-software results, not a trading-strategy rule.” (source)
• Stage it applies to: Growth, Select and Lightning, evaluation and sim-funded
• Consequence if breached: Not stated for martingale itself; a sizing pattern that creates an opposing position trips the firm’s separate automated hedging breach instead.
• Cost at $50K: $145 list, $0 activation, on a $2,000 max-loss floor at $50K = $72.50 per $1,000 of loss room (Growth 50K, the cheapest of Tradeify’s own three $50K plans).
• Payouts: Elite Live funded accounts pay an 80/20 split once a trader is moved off the sim-funded stage.
• Watch out for: A move to Elite Live is mandatory, not optional, and no sim profit carries over when it happens; martingale’s one condition is staying on the same side of the market, since a two-sided grid-style ladder would likely trip the hedging rule even though grid itself is never named.
• Trustpilot: 4.4/5 on 4,918 reviews (read October 1, 2026). rules.

City Traders Imperium caps martingale at 2% on one plan, then bans grid on every plan

City Traders Imperium is the clearest proof that martingale and grid need separate answers at the same firm.

Video: “How Automation Made Jarreau Thousands in Prop Trading,” City Traders Imperium official YouTube channel, April 9, 2023. No official CTI video is specifically about the Martin Gale & Grid Trading Rules; this official automation-themed video is the closest available on the firm’s own channel.

• Martingale: Allowed with cap, Max 2% combined risk on the trade idea, 1-Step Challenge only; more than 3 positions added against the market counts as martingale. “”Martingale is allowed on the 1-Step Challenge, provided the total risk on the trade idea doesn’t exceed 2%.” “Martingale is NOT allowed on: 2-Step Challenge. Instant Funding. Instant Funding Pro.” “More than 3 positions taken as the market moves against you will be classified as Martingale.”” (source)
• Grid trading: Banned, Banned on every program, including the same 1-Step plan that permits capped martingale. “”Grid Trading is NOT allowed on: 1-Step Challenge. 2-Step Challenge. Instant Funding. Instant Funding Pro.”” (source)
• Stage it applies to: Martingale: 1-Step Challenge only. Grid: all programs.
• Consequence if breached: Not numbered for this specific rule; the firm’s general Prohibited Trading Methods clause allows a retake, trade removal, account cancellation or a cut to leverage and risk.
• Cost at $50K: $299 list, $0 activation, on a $2,500 max-loss floor at $50K = $119.60 per $1,000 of loss room.
• Payouts: Payout rules were not part of this check; see the firm’s profile page linked below.
• Watch out for: A live call-up exists but is discretionary and not described as declinable anywhere on the firm’s pages; the martingale cap applies only to the 1-Step, so upgrading to the 2-Step or Instant Funding drops the permission entirely, and grid is banned regardless of which plan you choose.
• Trustpilot: 4.2/5 on 1,627 reviews (read October 1, 2026). profile.

Firms that never name martingale or grid, checked October 3, 2026

Silence is not permission. Each firm below was checked against its rules page, Terms of Service or prohibited-trading-strategies document, and a help-center search for both exact words; neither style is named anywhere official. Get written confirmation from support before trading either style with real risk.

Alpha Capital Group, checked and not confirmed either way

Alpha Pro 6% 2-Step 50K. Alpha Capital Group’s dedicated Prohibited Trading Strategies article names latency trading, arbitrage, high-frequency trading, reverse trading and position spamming (3 or more positions within 60 seconds), but never martingale or grid. A help-center search for both exact words returned “0 search results found”, and the firm’s 86,000-character Terms and Conditions carries zero hits either.

Trustpilot: hidden (21,810 reviews).

Apex Trader Funding, checked and not confirmed either way

EOD Trail Standard 50K. Apex’s Prohibited Activities page bans a non-directional “bracket trading” pattern and names High Frequency Trading as a form of simulation manipulation, but neither its Prohibited Activities page nor its Terms of Use names martingale or grid trading. A blanket “No Automation or Algorithm Usage” clause would catch an automated version of either style regardless.

Trustpilot: 4.2/5 (21,181 reviews).

Bulenox, checked and not confirmed either way

Qualification 50K, Option 2. Bulenox’s FAQ explicitly allows bots, algorithms and trade copiers for a trader’s own code, but no page, a fresh read of its 18-item FAQ, its 48-item help center, or its 167,014-byte Terms of Use names martingale or grid trading. The firm’s only named trading-style ban targets scalping algorithms and rapid-fire automated trades.

Trustpilot: 4.7/5 (1,800 reviews).

FTMO, checked and not confirmed either way

Challenge 2-Step (Standard) 50K. FTMO’s Forbidden Trading Practices page bans “opening substantially larger position sizes” and a substantially different number of positions than a trader’s own history, which could brush against an aggressive martingale or grid pattern in practice, but neither strategy is named anywhere on the page, the Challenge Terms and Conditions, or the FAQ search.

Trustpilot: 4.8/5 (53,448 reviews).

FXIFY, checked and not confirmed either way

Two Phase Classic (static) 50K. FXIFY’s dedicated prohibited-strategies article names 14 banned practices in detail, including high-frequency trading, latency arbitrage and statistical arbitrage, but never martingale or grid trading. Its broad “Improper Risk Management” and “Gambling behaviour” categories give the firm wide discretion over loss-recovery betting patterns without ever naming either style.

Trustpilot: 4.3/5 (6,345 reviews).

MyFundedFutures, checked and not confirmed either way

Rapid 50K. MyFundedFutures’ “Fair Play and Prohibited Trading Practices” article bans hedging and order-fill manipulation by name and separately permits automated strategies built around a trader’s own settings broadly, but martingale and grid are never mentioned in that article, the Terms of Service, or a help-center search for either word.

Trustpilot: 4.9/5 (22,110 reviews).

Topstep, checked and not confirmed either way

Trading Combine 50K, No Activation Fee Path. Topstep’s Prohibited Trading Strategies article covers account stacking, SIM-fill exploitation and unfair technology in detail, and its help-center search engine returns zero results for both “martingale” and “grid.” A day-trading-only rule (flat by 3:10pm CT) and a $2,000 trailing loss limit would likely stop an aggressive sequence in practice, but neither style is named one way or the other.

Trustpilot: 3.6/5 (14,892 reviews).

Firms that ban martingale or grid trading

These four firms ban at least one of the two styles by name on their own current pages. Audacity and Funding Traders ban both; Blue Guardian Futures bans martingale and is silent on grid; FundedNext Futures bans grid and is silent on martingale. Shown as cautionary, never omitted.

Audacity, bans both styles

Ability Challenge, Ability One and FTP (all programs). Audacity’s own Prohibited Trading Practices document bans martingale by its textbook definition: “increase the lot size that you trade after each loss, hoping that a win will recover all the previous losses… this kind of trading is not allowed at Audacity Capital.” Grid trading gets its own numbered rule on the same document, and a second Knowledge Center article folds it into a hedging/arbitrage rule: “also known as Arbitrage and Grid Trading, and is not permitted.” Neither section states a numeric consequence; the firm’s general discretionary-termination clause (T&C 9.2) applies, forfeiting the joining fee.

Trustpilot: hidden (293 reviews).

Funding Traders, bans both styles

2-Step Pro6 50K (ban is firm-wide, not product-specific). Funding Traders bans both strategies twice in its own Terms of Service: “Any form of martingale and grid trading strategies is not tolerated due to its nature of high leverage and high risk over a large series of trades” (§2.5), and again, “Grid, hedge, martingale, arbitrage, and off-the-shelf bots are forbidden” (§8). A help-center article separately confirms the grid ban. Section 2.5 states “immediate termination of our contractual relationship unless you are able to justify the occurrence”; §8 classifies it a hard breach with immediate discontinuation, applying “at every status” including funded.

Trustpilot: hidden (3,259 reviews).

Blue Guardian Futures, bans martingale, silent on grid

Standard 50K. Blue Guardian Futures answers a direct FAQ question on martingale: “Is Martingale Accepted? No, Martingale strategies are not permitted at Blue Guardian Futures. Traders are not allowed to use trading strategies that involve progressively increasing position sizes after a losing trade.” The same ~72,000-character Prohibited Trading Strategies article, read in full, never mentions grid trading, and a direct help-center search for the word returns zero results. Consequence: “may be subject to review and action in accordance with our trading rules.”

Trustpilot: 3.7/5 (1,807 reviews).

FundedNext Futures, bans grid, silent on martingale

Flex Challenge 50K. FundedNext Futures’ own “prohibited trading strategies” article bans grid trading with a worked numeric example: “A trader places multiple buy orders at $100, $105, and $110 and sell orders at $115, $120, and $125. If the market drops sharply below $100, all buy orders lose value at once.” Martingale is never mentioned anywhere on the firm’s pages; a direct help-center search for the word returns “We couldn’t find any articles matching ‘martingale’.” General consequence: “account suspension, disqualification, or restrictions.”

Trustpilot: 4.5/5 (80,687 reviews).

How to get written confirmation from a firm before you trade

1. Open a support ticket or live chat, not a public forum or social post, so you have a dated, attributable answer.
2. Name the exact style (martingale or grid trading) and ask whether it is permitted on the specific plan and size you intend to buy, not the brand generally.
3. Ask for the answer in writing (email or a saved chat transcript), and ask if the answer changes between the evaluation and the funded stage.
4. Ask what the stated consequence is if the rule is later found to apply, and whether any risk cap (like a maximum combined risk percentage) is attached.
5. Re-check before every purchase; firms in this guide have changed and clarified these pages without notice.

Checklist before you trade martingale or grid at a prop firm

• Is martingale named in the rules, by word, not just implied by a general risk clause?
• Is grid trading named in the rules, separately from martingale?
• Is there a numeric risk cap per trade, and does it apply at every stage or only one plan?
• Which plans and sizes does the permission or ban actually cover?
• What happens if you break the rule: a warning, a review, or immediate termination?
• Do you have a written answer from support, dated, for the exact plan you are buying?

Final picks for prop firms that allow martingale and grid trading

Cheapest clean allowance: E8 Markets (E8 Pro 8% preset, $57.00 per $1,000 of loss room), if martingale is your style and you accept that grid trading is