News
Home » News » ICT Interest Rate Effects on Currency Trades Explained

ICT Interest Rate Effects on Currency Trades Explained

Month 04 of the Core Content mentorship, grounded in its timestamped transcript: three Treasury futures compared rather than read in isolation, the failure swing he treats as a shift in the interest-rate complex, a predetermined dollar bias and a focus point before the rate markets are checked, and his own instruction to pass when the markets do not line up.

Document-based research and editorial review. Last reviewed September 24, 2026 13 min read

Key takeaways

This is Month 04 of the Core Content mentorship, on interest rate effects on currency trades, and it opens with his claim that interest rates are 0:42 the single most influential driving force behind market moves.

Read the full summary

This is Month 04 of the Core Content mentorship, on interest rate effects on currency trades, and it opens with his claim that interest rates are 0:42 the single most influential driving force behind market moves. The tool is what he calls an interest rate triad – the 30-year Treasury bond futures, the 10-year note and the 5-year note, compared against one another rather than read in isolation (1:22, 1:31, 1:37). In his frame all three should confirm each important higher high or lower low; when two make the new extreme and the third fails to follow he calls that a failure swing and reads it as a shift in the interest-rate complex (7:20, 7:50, 8:32). He is explicit that it is not an entry signal: the trader starts with a predetermined read on the market being traded and waits for price to reach a focus point – an order block, a liquidity pool, a liquidity void or a fair value gap – before checking the triad against the U.S. Dollar Index (13:16, 18:49); if the rate markets and the index do not line up, he says to pass on the idea (19:02). In the worked example from the week of the recording he reports a failed higher high in the 30-year, a middle maturity he describes as flat to neutral, and a higher high in the 5-year (11:17, 12:02, 12:17), and reads that as confirming a bullish dollar view and bearish scenarios for the euro and cable. No fills, account results or chart levels can be established from the transcript.

How we researched this article

BestProps used document-based research from primary firm sources, checked September 24, 2026. The complete source list, scope, limitations, and commercial-state record appear near the end of this article.

Editorial methodology Report a correction

In ICT Mentorship Core Content – Month 04 – Interest Rate Effects On Currency Trades, he presents a comparative framework that links U.S. Treasury futures, the U.S. Dollar Index and foreign-currency setups. His stated premise is that understanding interest rate shifts and changes can assist in selecting trades (0:50), and that comparing the three maturities gives a visual depiction of what he calls smart money accumulation and distribution (1:10).

The lesson does not offer the rate comparison as a signal to trade on its own. He builds it as a confirmation step inside a process that starts with an expectation about the market being traded and a price area chosen in advance. Because the source is an automated transcript of the audio and the charts are not reproduced on this page, every chart reading below is reported from his narration rather than inspected independently.

What he calls the interest rate triad

At 1:19 he defines the triad as three interest rate futures markets, traded on the futures exchanges (1:40):

  • The 30-year Treasury bond, which he calls the key long-term interest rate benchmark (1:22)
  • The 10-year note, which he calls the intermediate-term interest rate (1:31)
  • The 5-year note, which he calls the short-term interest rate (1:37)

His claim is that reading their price action in relation to one another unlocks a great deal of what normally evades a trader hunting price action setups (1:53), and that failure swings at opportunistic times can validate institutional order flow (2:10). These are futures prices, not plots of yields; he states the inverse relationship himself later in the recording, saying that as these charts trend higher the interest rates are actually declining (19:59).

The accumulation and distribution model behind it

Before applying the triad to currencies he asks 2:44 and sets out a comparison model. In bearish conditions, a base asset or benchmark makes higher highs (3:04) while closely correlated instruments make lower highs, which he reads as distribution (3:24). He names the benchmark by market: the Dow Jones Industrial for stocks, the Dollar Index for currencies and the CRB Index for commodities (3:12). In bullish conditions the mirror image applies: the benchmark makes lower lows while related markets hold higher lows, which he calls accumulation (4:32).

His explanation is a supply-and-demand argument – if the position is being accumulated the price is not allowed to discount – and he attributes the pattern to institutional activity. That attribution is his interpretation; the recording offers no independent test of it. He then restates the triad (6:35) and says that overlaying the three markets is how accumulation and distribution can be highlighted inside the interest-rate market itself (6:56).

The failure swing he is looking for

The diagram shows treasury comparison, lower low, failure swing and higher low.
The failure-swing comparison highlights one Treasury market not confirming the others. Educational illustration, not a price chart.

The operating rule comes at 7:20: the three Treasury markets should confirm every higher high or lower low at moments when the Dollar Index is at a significant price point. Failure swings, in his words, highlight smart money participation and validate trading opportunities (7:34). It does not take all three to break; he says you only need one of them to fail to follow the pattern (7:50).

He walks through a graphic: two of the three make the lower low, top and bottom, while the middle maturity highlighted in blue does not, and that middle one is what he labels the failure swing (8:32). He reads it as an interest rate shift, and says that if it happens while a trader is identifying an institutional order reference point in the Dollar Index – for example a bullish order block – it confirms that particular idea (8:55).

On the charts he uses: he says the ones shown come from bar chart dot com, which he describes as free (9:31). His point there is that simply plotting open, high, low and close on these specific markets does not convey understanding, and that the analysis has to be comparative rather than read off a single chart, which is why he says the pattern evades most people.

The week he walks through on the charts

At 10:33 he turns to the move in the Dollar Index during the week of the recording: he says it came down into the 99.50 level and rallied aggressively away from it (10:40). The 30-year chart he then shows is a 90-minute chart covering roughly fifteen to eighteen days (11:00), and in it he points to a failed higher high between the 5th and the 7th or 8th of the month, which he calls a failure swing in the 30-year (11:17), and says that on its own it means nothing.

He then compares the same highs on the shorter maturities: the next one down he describes as relatively unchanged, flat to neutral, neither a considerable higher high nor a lower high (12:02), and on the 5-year he says there was clearly a higher high (12:17). His summary is that this combination by itself highlights a shift in the interest rate market (12:32).

Educational infographic titled HOW HE SAYS TO USE IT AS A FILTER. A band headed HIS FRAME reads that he says interest rate comparison is not an entry signal on its own, that it is a check made on an idea he already holds, and that he does not go into the bond market hunting for divergences. Four panels follow. STEP ONE, A PREDETERMINED BIAS: he starts with an expectation about the market he intends to trade, in his example a bullish dollar read, and refuses to look at the rate markets without one. STEP TWO, A POINT OF FOCUS: price has to arrive at a level he selected in advance, an order block, a liquidity pool, a liquidity void or a fair value gap, using the focus points from the first month of the mentorship. STEP THREE, COMPARE THE THREE MATURITIES: at that level he looks at the 30-year, the 10-year and the 5-year together, watching whether all three confirm the same extreme or whether one fails to. STEP FOUR, CONFIRM OR PASS: if two confirm and one fails he treats it as the smart money fingerprint behind the idea, and if there is no obvious indication that large funds are working he says pass on the idea and look for another. An additional note reads that he also states the inverse relationship plainly: when these futures prices rise, interest rates are declining, and he ties a rising rate complex to dollar strength and pressure on foreign currencies. A footer reads: educational diagram of his spoken framework, no prices, no levels, no pip targets, no chart data, no results, and it is not a chart from the video. Conceptual diagram only: no candlesticks, no numeric axes, no currency symbols, no price arrows.
The filter as he describes it, in his order. He does not present the rate comparison as a signal on its own: the trader commits first to a directional read on the market being traded, then waits for price to reach a focus point chosen in advance – an order block, a liquidity pool, a liquidity void or a fair value gap – and only then compares the 30-year, the 10-year and the 5-year to see whether all three confirm the same extreme or one fails to. Two confirming and one failing is what he calls the smart money fingerprint behind the idea; no confirmation means passing on it. He also states the inverse relationship between these futures prices and interest rates, and links a rising rate complex to dollar strength and pressure on foreign currencies. AI-generated educational diagram of his spoken framework; it is not a chart from the recording and reproduces no market data or levels.

How the divergence is meant to confirm the trade

His next point is that the process has to start from an idea he already holds. At 13:16 he says he does not scan the bond market looking for these divergences, and that a trader has to have a predetermined view about how the market they intend to trade should behave. Over the same window he compares, he says the Dollar Index made a lower low and traded into a significant price level (13:31), which he notes is on a closing basis, and that this stands against the 30-year failing to make the higher high it should have made comparably.

The level itself he ties back to an old order block from the midpoint of November that had already been traded back into once, on 15 November, before price came back down into the same 99.50 area in the week that includes 8 December (14:15, 14:34) and rallied hard. For foreign currencies he draws the consequence: that dollar strength gives reasons to trust bearish order blocks, bearish turtle soups and returns to fair value, with big ranges closing, then continuation lower after a retracement higher (15:56).

At 15:12 he states the purpose of the whole exercise: when price trades into that order block, the rate markets are where he looks for a clue that the smart money is working the level. He says this is his answer to the common question of how to validate which order block to trade from, and that a matching divergence at a specific order block on the Dollar Index is what he calls the green light to start refining the idea.

The euro and cable examples from that week

With a bullish dollar read he says the natural focus is the other side of the pair, and he names the euro (using the nickname fiber) (15:56). He says a level of buy stops had been indicated before the week started and that the market rallied back above the 108.15 to 108.20 area, clearing out the buy stops, then rolled all the way up through 108.65, which he describes as an old low not shown on the chart he had up (16:20, 16:26). Those figures are reproduced exactly as the automated transcript renders them; he is describing a euro chart, the exact digits are his reported coordinates rather than prices confirmed here, and they should be treated as approximate.

He also blends a second market into the read: cable, meaning GBP/USD, failed to make a higher high at the same time the euro made its higher high and the dollar made its lower low (16:47). His conclusion is that divergence is not always a matter of one asset in one location, and that a couple of things sometimes have to be blended to read what the smart money is doing. He also concedes the limits of the model: 17:59, because a longer-term shift can disturb the short-term relationships, and he says the scenarios repeat themselves over a long period rather than every time.

His action plan, and when he says to pass

He then turns the teaching into a plan, saying it has to be framed so it is useful in context rather than in hindsight, and points back to the focus points taught in the first month of the mentorship (18:34). His sequence is:

  1. Hold a predetermined bullish or bearish expectation for the market being traded (13:16).
  2. Wait for price to trade to a focus point: an order block, a liquidity pool, a liquidity void or a fair value gap (18:49).
  3. At that point compare the 30-year, the 10-year and the 5-year against the Dollar Index (7:20).
  4. If there is no obvious indication that large funds are moving, pass on the idea and look for another (19:02).

The bearish-dollar version

He runs the same logic in the other direction. On a bearish dollar read he says you would see the rate markets making lower lows, one after another, until eventually one of them fails to make that lower low (19:33, 19:36), and that failure is what validates the sell signals being read on the Dollar Index at a bearish order block, an old high, a liquidity pool or a trade into a fair value gap. He then expects the dollar to roll lower and these three futures to trade higher in price, which in his framework means interest rates declining, and he calls that bearish for the dollar (19:59).

What the recording establishes and what it does not

In closing he repeats the main warning: this is not a matter of selling every up candle or buying every down candle, but of looking behind the scenes at the underpinnings of the market (20:29), and he describes the rate-market divergence as a fingerprint the smart money leaves behind that validates a setup (20:38).

What the recording contains is his framework and his reading of his own charts in one week. It does not contain order fills, position sizes, account results, win rates or any independent measurement of the pattern, and it does not define an objective tolerance for calling a swing flat or specify how close together in time two compared extremes must sit. The chart levels and drawings are reported from his narration; this article did not view the charts, and nothing here should be read as verified profitability, a recommendation to copy a trade, or evidence that the pattern works.

Date and identity note

He dates the whole content delivery of the first month of this mentorship to September 2016 (2:20), and describes the illustrated week as the week that includes 8 December. The transcript does not give the calendar year of that week, so no year is assigned to it here. The watch page lists the upload as 6 September 2022, which is the publication date of this recording on YouTube and must not be read as the date of the market activity he describes.

A note on the transcription

The source for this article is the full original audio of the recording, transcribed locally with the whisper-large-v3-turbo automatic speech recognition model; it is automatic transcription, not human-verified captions, and it carries automated timestamps. The cached source records a complete decode of the full audio, but automatic transcription still mishears terms and digits and it cannot see the charts. That is why the level figures he speaks are quoted as his reported coordinates and left unconfirmed here, and no claim depends on a chart the reviewer did not see. The recording itself is public and playable on YouTube; it is not embedded on this page because the video owner has disabled playback on other websites, which was tested directly – see the card below.

ICT Mentorship Core Content – Month 04 – Interest Rate Effects On Currency Trades

The Inner Circle Trader · watch page lists upload 6 September 2022 · 1255 seconds, about 20 minutes 55 seconds · public, not unlisted. The recording identifies itself as Month 04 of the Core Content mentorship and refers back to the first month of that mentorship. This recording is the primary source for every timestamp link on this page.

Watch on YouTube ↗

The recording is not embedded here. An embedded player was tested directly on 15 September 2026 from a BestProps page origin at desktop and mobile widths: the frame loads and then reports “Playback on other websites has been disabled by the video owner”, with no playable stream and no duration reported in either case. The link above opens the recording on YouTube itself.

Resources

These are the sources checked while preparing this article. The CME page is the exchange’s own overview of the 30-year Treasury bond futures contract at the long end of the triad; the CFTC advisory is the regulator’s note on trading systems and hypothetical results sold to the public. Neither evaluates this speaker, tests whether an interest rate divergence provides an edge, verifies the levels quoted in the recording or endorses anything said in it. Any ICT, smart-money or third-party indicator, script, note set, chart annotation, transcript pack or re-upload circulating outside the publishing channel’s own page is unofficial, has not been tested here, and no claims about its accuracy are made.