Key takeaways
The Inner Circle Trader’s 19 minutes 59 seconds pre-session review for 7 June 2026 presents conditional scenarios, not verified forecasts or trades.
Read the full summary
The Inner Circle Trader’s 19 minutes 59 seconds pre-session review for 7 June 2026 presents conditional scenarios, not verified forecasts or trades. ICT expects dollar strength after buy-side liquidity was taken and an inefficiency acted as an inversion fair value gap, with EUR/USD and GBP/USD potentially moving toward relative equal lows and sell-side liquidity. He advises avoiding event-driven crude oil despite a close at 87.76 below the 88.25 wick midpoint suggesting a draw toward the wick low, and he remains open to crude ultimately rising. Gold downside requires a close below the stated 4,320 wick midpoint before the low and next low become objectives, while silver targets roughly 58 first and could accelerate toward lower lows, though claims about participants wanting silver below $50 are unsupported allegations. Dow, ES and NQ scenarios share a three-high capitulation thesis and require breaks below imbalances or relative equal lows followed by retracements that treat former volume imbalances as premium arrays or inversion fair value gaps. ICT rejects the conventional broken-resistance-turned-support interpretation near old ES and NQ highs and instead anticipates lower inefficiencies and potentially greater summer volatility. The recording was made before the Sunday 6 p.m. Eastern futures open and contains no contract months, entries, fills, stops, position sizes, risk parameters, realized results or post-publication outcomes, so every scenario must be evaluated from its stated condition without hindsight.
How we researched this article
BestProps used document-based research from primary firm sources, checked September 24, 2026. The complete source list, scope, limitations, and commercial-state record appear near the end of this article.
The review is built on charts, and this summary is written from the automatically transcribed audio of the full recording rather than from a visual review, so the chart detail is described only as he narrates it. Spoken numbers are included where the recording is clear and are flagged where they are not. The recording does not establish any entry, fill, position size, stop or result, and nothing here is a recommendation to copy one of his scenarios.
He opens by saying he will give his opinions about what he thinks is likely to happen “going into this week and the weeks thereafter” (0:02). Near the end he says he will be watching how the market opens later that day at 6 p.m. Eastern time and will post on X if anything is noteworthy (19:15). That timing (a review recorded before a Sunday evening futures open) is the context for reading everything below as a pre-session plan rather than a recap of what happened.
ICT Market Commentary on Dollar Liquidity
He starts on the dollar daily chart (0:21). In his reading, buy-side liquidity had already been taken, price pulled back into an inefficiency that he treats as an inversion fair value gap, and a volume imbalance had been used to support price. From there he says he is looking for a more pronounced run through a nearby high and on toward the next pool of dollar liquidity.
He then draws the intermarket conclusion: a stronger dollar index would “set the stage” for lower prices in EUR/USD and GBP/USD (1:23). That relationship is his framework for reading the two currency pairs in the same review, not a causal claim the recording establishes.
ICT Market Scenario for EUR/USD Equal Lows
On the euro daily chart (1:37) he points to buy-side liquidity that had been taken, a reaction from an inefficiency, and relative equal lows where he says sell-side liquidity sits. His stated view is a move lower toward those lows.
He then goes into more detail on how the candle bodies behaved. He says the bodies began respecting an inversion fair value gap, that price left it on a closing basis, and that a small wick outside the area (which he informally calls a “mohawk”) is acceptable inside his model (2:16). He describes price ripping back up to roughly the consequent encroachment level of that gap and then dying down, leaving the lower liquidity pools as the objective. One phrase in this passage is unclear in the automated transcript; the article does not rely on it.
ICT Market Scenario for GBP/USD Liquidity Pools
The pound-dollar review starts at 3:04. He notes buy-side liquidity taken, a small inversion fair value gap and a break lower, and says he is looking for an attempt below a nearer low before a deeper move. Using the same body behaviour as the euro (bodies inside the gap, a permissible wick, then a break), he says he expects the area price is now inside to act as an inversion fair value gap if price trades lower, to be treated as a premium array, and to lead to the minor sell-side pool first and the more prominent one after that (3:32).
ICT Market Commentary on Avoiding Crude Oil
Crude oil is the market he is least willing to forecast (4:04). He says viewers should stay away from it or get “beat up pretty bad”, describes a volume imbalance that had been used, and grades a wick: he reads the close at 87.76 as sitting below 88.25, the consequent encroachment of that wick, and treats that as suggesting a draw down to clear the wick’s low (4:54).
He then qualifies it. He says he is not confident enough to claim the deeper low gets taken out, because he reads the preceding move as a stop hunt, and he says he suspects crude may ultimately go higher (5:11). He links that uncertainty to geopolitical news coverage, saying nothing had really changed in the Middle East and that he applies heavy scepticism to what domestic media reports, including conflicting signals about how long a conflict might last. Those are his opinions about news coverage; the transcript supplies no evidence for them, and nothing in it establishes why crude oil traded as it did.
The narrower, transferable point is the one he states himself: because the market was reacting to headlines, he treats it as an event-driven market and says you should stay away from it. A technical scenario in a headline-sensitive market carries gap, volatility and execution uncertainty that a daily chart read cannot remove.
ICT Market Scenario for Gold Below the Wick Midpoint
On gold (6:23) he also tells viewers to keep their hands off it. He says price had traded up into an inefficiency: if it were going to go higher it would have used that area as an inversion fair value gap, but instead it acted as a premium array, price broke lower and sold off. He then puts a condition on the downside: watching a wick, he says that if price closes below the level he reads as 4,320 (which he describes as half of that wick), there is a strong likelihood the low and the next low are taken out (6:37). He explicitly says he is not going to call it yet and that it is a potential.
He describes the prior action as heavy distribution and says the market was punishing anyone who believed gold could only go straight up, comparing the sentiment to tulip mania and saying the pattern resembled what he had called the Hunt brothers episode (7:22). Those are analogies and characterisations of market sentiment, not verified accounts of either episode, and the transcript does not show whether his 4,320 condition was ever met.
ICT Market Commentary on the Silver 58 Target
Silver gets a similar treatment (8:03). He identifies a sell-side liquidity pool and calls it the next objective, saying it is “basically 58” (8:19), and adds that if price accelerates through it the lows below would be taken out quickly.
He then goes further than the chart: he says unspecified participants “want silver below $50”, repeats the Hunt brothers comparison, describes margin being raised so that ordinary traders could not afford the market, and calls it a “rigged game” and “a club” (8:30). These are allegations about intent, not findings. The recording contains no evidence of coordinated action, and none of it should be read as an explanation of why silver traded as it did.
ICT Futures Scenario for a Dow Capitulation High
He turns to the Dow at 8:58. His opening idea is a potential capitulation high: he says the run to the old high looked convincing enough that everybody wanted to be short, refers back to what he had said in Twitter Spaces about seeing an extrapolated run to the upside as the market entered May, and says the index has now done the business of creating three highs (high, high, higher high) before “giving up the ghost” (9:47).
The mechanics of his scenario are conditional. He marks a level that he says could present itself as an inversion fair value gap, checks whether a volume imbalance sits between the candles, and says that if price gets below it he would expect a dig into the relative equal lows, then the sell-side liquidity pool and an inefficiency, and then the next sell-side area after that (10:17). He also says that if the market uses the premium side of his premium/discount array, comes back up, treats the area as a premium rate and starts selling off, he would look for the lower lows.
He then tempers his own bearish case: he says if it can do that, “then you must… armageddon”, but that he is not that overzealous right now (11:06).
ICT Futures Scenario for E-mini S&P 500 Lows
Before the ES charts he spends a couple of minutes on his own distribution problems, saying that between YouTube and X the situation feels like “controlled opposition” and that posts he thought he had sent never appeared (11:23). That is his account of events and is not verifiable from the recording; it is noted here only because he attributes part of the missing commentary to it.
On ES he marks relative equal lows, notes the market could even open below them on Sunday, and identifies a positive imbalance that he would like to see broken and then used as an inversion fair value gap on the way back down (12:20).
His clearest methodological disagreement is here. He says the old high in that area is a point of interest, then rejects the conventional reading that a return to it would be treated as broken resistance turning into support for a new all-time-high run. He says he does not subscribe to that view, expects a trade down instead, and thinks price will dig into the lower inefficiencies in what could be a more volatile summer (13:12).
Later in the same segment he describes the structure he would trade: if price takes out the lows and then retraces into the volume imbalance that was created on the way up and smashed through, he would anticipate that area acting as a premium array and the market leaning lower again (15:26).
The ES discussion also expands into commentary about 401(k) assets, private equity, government conduct and market capitulation (13:40). Those are speculative macro and political opinions. They are not derived from the chart review, and no part of them is established by the recording.
ICT Futures Scenario for the Nasdaq Retracement Zone
NQ is the last market he reviews (17:34). He marks relative equal lows and a volume imbalance at a wick low, says he wants to see price trade through it and then treat that area as an inversion fair value gap, and adds a specific condition for a retracement: if price trades back up into the larger imbalance he points to, that is where he would like to see it stop (18:08).
He raises the same caveat as on ES. There is an old high nearby that he says retail would read as a return to broken resistance turned support; he does not subscribe to that view, and his expectation is that a move back down would work into the lower inefficiencies, which could themselves become inversion fair value gaps (18:18).
How to Review ICT Market Scenarios
Most of what follows is the practical consequence of how this recording is built, a set of conditional statements made before a session.
- Confirm the source and date. The mapped recording is dated 7 June 2026 and was uploaded by The Inner Circle Trader; anything else attributed to that date should be checked against it rather than assumed.
- Name the contract and month. Index futures trade several delivery months at once, so “the Dow” or “Nasdaq” is not a specification. A level is only comparable when the contract and month match.
- Declare the session and time zone. This review was recorded before a Sunday evening futures open, so its conditions were written for a session that had not started.
- State the thesis as conditions. Gold above depends on a close below the level he reads as 4,320; the Dow and ES cases depend on breaks and retracements. Without the condition the scenario is incomplete rather than wrong.
- Keep timestamped evidence. Each section above carries a link to the moment he says it, so a reader can check the wording rather than a summary of it.
- Compare without hindsight. The recording stops before the market resolved. Reading his conditions afterwards, with knowledge of the outcome, is not the same as evaluating them when they were made.
What This ICT Market Review Does Not Establish
Three limits matter for anyone reading this as a record of skill rather than a set of ideas. First, the transcript contains no entries, fills, stops, sizes, risk parameters or realised results, so nothing here indicates that any scenario was traded or profitable. Second, it contains no information after publication, so no outcome can be attributed to any level on this page. Third, several statements in the recording (about media honesty, coordinated intent in silver, government conduct, private equity and 401(k) assets) are the speaker’s opinions or allegations, and the transcript provides no supporting evidence for them.
Those limits are also why a later recording can be checked against this one but cannot confirm it. In his June 18, 2026 commentary ICT refers back to a Sunday review “on the 7th” as the session where he had set out these expectations (June 18 commentary, 14:55), which is a useful cross-check on what he says he said, not evidence that what he expected then came to pass.
ICT Futures Review Video for June 07 2026
The recording this article summarises is Futures Review & Commentary \ June 07, 2026 from The Inner Circle Trader, uploaded 7 June 2026 with a runtime of 19:59. Its title, channel, upload date and runtime were read from the watch page, and the player was tested: the page is public, and the player returns the message that playback on other websites has been disabled by the video owner, so it cannot be embedded here. The video remains the only place to see the charts and to check the figures flagged above.
Watch the original recording on YouTube
Playback on other websites has been disabled by the video owner, so the player cannot be embedded in this article. The same message appears when the player is tested directly. Open the video on YouTube to review it yourself.
ICT Market Commentary Sources
- [1] YouTube: Futures Review & Commentary \ June 07, 2026, The Inner Circle Trader (primary source recording; watch page read and player tested, embed disabled by the owner; audio transcribed for this summary)
- [2] CFTC: Futures Market Basics (official background on what a futures contract fixes at the time of agreement, including the delivery month)
- [3] NinjaTrader 8 help: Trading Hours (platform documentation showing how exchange and session templates define when a session starts and stops)
- [4] TradingView: ICT Index Futures Session Lines (unofficial third-party script published by a community author)
On third-party indicators: the session-lines script above is one trader’s community implementation, is not official ICT material, and has not been tested, inspected or recommended here. No result is reported for it, and no claim is made about whether it repaints, how it times anything or how it would have affected any outcome. No other indicator, script or tool is named or endorsed on this page.
BestProps is not affiliated with The Inner Circle Trader, YouTube, the CFTC or NinjaTrader, and no source listed here endorses this article, this site or any setup. Nothing on this page claims that any level predicts price, that any session was verified on a live or funded account, or that any approach produces a reliable result, and nothing here is individualised investment advice.